Steve, there are/were two divergant Zone System tendencies. One emphasized number assignment, the other emphasized previsualization. Two sides of the same coin, appeal IMO to two fundamentally different kinds of personality. You're right that Zone System doesn't simply mean "previsualization," but previsualization is central to it. Post-processing that's not the result of previsualization is (IMO) outside Zone System, a matter of manipulation (not a negative IMO). I happen to resonate more with what I understand, from several of his students, to be Minor White's angle on Zone System rather than Ansel Adams'. I think Minor's angle emphasized previsualization more than Ansel's. Minor's students were printing masters but they didn't seem very interested in densitometry and were obviously drawn to strongly emotional images more than to beautiful rock and water with subtle tonal scales. Like Weston, a better printer early on than Ansel, Minor appealed more to sensualists. From small dealings in the Seventies with Ansel and his students, and from following his books and later work, it seems to me that he grew more technically than visually with age, the opposite of Minor's growth. In Ansel's last (perhaps) book project he focused on quantitative technical matters (scanning and lithography). This is honorable, an extension of his angle on the Zone System that he began with Minor White. Minor, on by contrast, was a Zen practitioner who photographed people, content, and meaning...a different side of the brain with different passions, employing a different angle on the Zone System. Ansel was also a fine people photographer who could make eloquent connections, but some forget that in their enthusiasm for numbers. Minor's Zone System game seemed to make the image he wanted to make. I think Ansel's was more a matter of process for its own sake...workflow. ++++ Photography and printmaking are part of a continuum and that this is sometimes forgotten by people at the extremes of the continuum. Djon --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > Firstly I did not assert that pre-visualisation was no longer relevant. > Secondly, the Zone system has nothing to do with black and white per se - it > is merely a system for determining appropriate exposure when such exposure > can not be significantly "altered" post shutter release. All the Zone > system does is provide a rigorous framework for determining middle exposure > and an understanding as to how the rest of the elements will be exposed as a > result.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Raw conversion and B&W
2005-06-01 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.