--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Moody" <moodymz3@y...> wrote: > What I meant by a true monochrome image is one where the intensity reading > of each element in the digital sensor independently maps to the final image. > With processing of sensor data with a Bayer interpolation routine, each > pixel is a combination of its own intensity and some portion of surrounding > pixels. In-camera jpegs and raw files converted with the standard software > will do this. > > See David Burren's page, http://burren.cx/photo/e950ir.html for an example > of the difference in processing. The fourth image down can be moused over > for comparison. Note that this image was taken with a sensor containing a > bayer filter, so it would not meet what I referred to as a "true monochrome > image". The filters on that particular camera are rather transparent to > near-IR so it's darn close. It's more than just "darn close". I use the same trick on my Nikon D100, shoot through a Wratten 87, convert with Dave Coffin's DCRAW in "document mode", then equalize the levels, and deviation is less than 1%, comparable to an actual monochrome sensor. The filters on all cameras that I've ever worked with are pretty much transparent to IR about 750nm.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] digital IR conversion
2005-06-02 by koloshor
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.