> From: tariqgibranstudio <tariqgibranstudio@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:20:45 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 4800 Vs 2100/2200 watercolor > > Is it true that the matte black ink for the 4800 is the exact same as > for the 4000? Yes >If so, that certainly would lead one to conclude that, > at lest as far as density is concerned, the 4800 would have no > advantage over the older generation on matte paper(Dmax) except > possibly smoother gradation due to the 3rd light black in the > midtones. And potentially greater ink limit than the 4000 >The main advantage of the new K3 printers are RC papers > using Photo Black which benefit with blacker blacks and less bronzing? Yes and no metamerism
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 4800 Vs 2100/2200 watercolor
2005-06-03 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.