I am curious. I do not have a wetroom background. How would one describe the difference in texture between a traditional fibre print and, say, Epson Premium Luster. Ignore ink for the moment - just the comparison of two sheets of blank white paper. On a scale of 1 to 10 are we at 2 (nowhere near the goal) or at, say, an 8 (close but no cigar)? Of course this is very subjective and perhaps I should go to a Lab and ask for a blank fibre print so that I can form my own opinion but I am wondering whether we collectively/generally think we are close or miles away. Steve (as you can tell I am very impressed with the K3 inks and it seems we are just missing the texture of the underlying substrate)
Message
Air fibre based vs current photo papers
2005-06-03 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.