What more can I say? Neutral - yes (confirmed by the numbers). Metamerism free - yes. Bronzing - for all practical purposes none. Dmax - great 2.45ish, enough for me. Ease of use - yes. Missing elements - I concur with Mr Gorman re the print preview, paper(? See my other post), and 9 inks rather than 8. Make no mistake, this is not just a trivial advance with respect to printing on "photo" paper. I have not tested matte paper yet but do not expect a great advance there - we need a new matte black ink for that, one that will make a significant impact to dMax (calling Mr Edmunds....). > From: Gary Brown <baffin@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:37:49 -0700 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800! > > Are the prints better, how do they look. > This endless discussion, sounds like the story of the electrical engineer > when asked how the music sounds, says let me get my analyzer then I'll tell > you what I think. > > Gary
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800!
2005-06-03 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.