Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800!

2005-06-03 by Steve Kale

What more can I say?  Neutral - yes (confirmed by the numbers).  Metamerism
free - yes.  Bronzing - for all practical purposes none.  Dmax - great
2.45ish, enough for me.  Ease of use - yes.  Missing elements - I concur
with Mr Gorman re the print preview, paper(? See my other post), and 9 inks
rather than 8.  Make no mistake, this is not just a trivial advance with
respect to printing on "photo" paper.  I have not tested matte paper yet but
do not expect a great advance there - we need a new matte black ink for
that, one that will make a significant impact to dMax (calling Mr
Edmunds....).  


> From: Gary Brown <baffin@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:37:49 -0700
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800!
> 
> Are the prints better, how do they look.
> This endless discussion, sounds like the story of the electrical engineer
> when asked how the music sounds, says let me get my analyzer then I'll tell
> you what I think.
> 
> Gary

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.