Steve, I can appreciate that! Full speed ahead with the 4800. So, does anyone have results this good with UC inks on ISP, or other non-matte paper? I'm starting to wonder if the number of list members with spectrophotometers is rather small. For those who want to print color and BW with one printer, the new UCK3 performance may be enough to persuade current owners of UC and UCHG printers to buy again. Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Steve Kale Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 3:49 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800! Sorry I don't have Epson inks in my 2100 which is fast being relegated to printing emails and letters only! ;-) > From: John Moody <moodymz3@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:45:12 -0400 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800! > > Steve, > Thanks for posting the data! Red-Green looks fantastic. > Any chance you have a comparison with your best result for the 2100 on ISP > using QTR? > > Best regards, > John Moody [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800!
2005-06-04 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.