Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800!

2005-06-04 by Steve Kale

The UC inks had awful bronzing on "photo" papers.  The dMax is likely up a
bit but anything over 2.2ish is practically indistinguishable.

Personally if I had a 4000 I would be out buying some 4800 ink cartridges
and swapping the chips.  The Firmware may prevent access to the LLK but QTR
will drive the better K, LK, LM, and LC (and (Y).  Very much worth a try.
Profiling for colour would be easy too.  (Someone a lot smarter than me
ought to be able to figure out a crack for the firmware also.)


> From: John Moody <moodymz3@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 07:43:21 -0400
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800!
> 
> Steve, I can appreciate that!  Full speed ahead with the 4800.
> 
> So, does anyone have results this good with UC inks on ISP, or other
> non-matte paper?  I'm starting to wonder if the number of list members with
> spectrophotometers is rather small.
> For those who want to print color and BW with one printer, the new UCK3
> performance may be enough to persuade current owners of UC and UCHG printers
> to buy again.
> 
> Best regards,
> John Moody

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.