> From: John Broski <jbroski@...> > > I do equal amounts of color > and B&W, and I do both glossy and matte (pretty much equally). You will definitely want the new K3 inks. The question is whether you will be able to run them in a 4000 at some later date. >I would like > to experiment more with BO printing, but the 1270 bands and the 2000P is too > coarse for my taste. I'm starting to sell some prints, and so I've got a > bit of money to reinvest into printing gear. The 4800 will be around $2000, > I guess. The 4000 is around $1600 from online sources, with a $300 rebate > that's good til June 30. So, call it $1300. (Actually $1250, delivered, > from ebuyer.com, after rebate.) I'd like to simplify my life and have just > one printer, and use UC inks. > > Now... do I have the pros and cons straight? Both printers are built like > tanks, and both accept the big 220ml cartridges for economy. > > It sounds like the 4800 will do good B&W and color, on gloss and matte > paper, right out of the box. But it requires a MK-to-PK changeover that > costs about $38 each time. And some sources indicate that its BO > performance is not good. BO doesn't work on glossy - even with the K3 inks. Tons of bronzing. > > The 4000 does good matte color, but some say it takes spraying to get good > gloss color (because of differential reflection). With QTR, I understand it > will do good B&W using the UC inkset, though I guess spraying is still > needed with glossy paper? I have never got the spraying to be acceptable. It is not necessary with the K3 inks. >But it carries both blacks onboard. And it does > good BO printing. I very much doubt the BO printing is different between the two machines. > > So it sounds like the only real downside of the 4000 is the need to spray on > glossy paper. How real is that problem? See above >Are some semi-matte/semigloss > papers acceptable with UC inks without spraying? Not in my opinion - at least not with any I have tried > > Any other factors I ought to consider? Advice welcome! With the 4000 you don't have access to the light light black. It supposedly has better linearized tables and it also has a much much better driver. Net net I would only buy the older machine if you thought you could run the new inks with the new driver in it - ie at some point have it "upgraded" to the 4800. Steve
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Advice needed... 4000 vs. 4800???
2005-06-07 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.