Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Advice needed... 4000 vs. 4800???

2005-06-08 by Scott Graham

Two or three thoughts:

my 4000 matte B&W is superior to Illford fiber based silver gelatin, so...

and BO is an "effect"; fine if you like it but not like a good rich black using all colors.

and if you are printing matte, don't expect a major difference with the 4800 on dmax: 
same matte black ink. (your gains will be minimal)

Scott

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Joe Davajon <davajon@s...> 
wrote:
> --- John Broski <jbroski@s...> wrote:
> And some sources indicate that its BO 
> performance is not good.
> 
> John,
> Would you kindly refer spefically to those "sources"? 
> I'm considering the 4800 specifically because of its
> touted superiority for B@W as reported by some.  I've
> had my 4000 for over a year and have been delighted
> with it except my dMax on matte B@W do not compare
> with the richness and density of my silver B@W.  I'd
> hate to lose money on my 4000 and spend more $ for the
> 4800 only to learn that my gains would be minimal.  
> Thank you for any consideration.
> Joe Davajon
> 
> 
> 
> Drop by my site at <davajon.net>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.