Two or three thoughts: my 4000 matte B&W is superior to Illford fiber based silver gelatin, so... and BO is an "effect"; fine if you like it but not like a good rich black using all colors. and if you are printing matte, don't expect a major difference with the 4800 on dmax: same matte black ink. (your gains will be minimal) Scott --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Joe Davajon <davajon@s...> wrote: > --- John Broski <jbroski@s...> wrote: > And some sources indicate that its BO > performance is not good. > > John, > Would you kindly refer spefically to those "sources"? > I'm considering the 4800 specifically because of its > touted superiority for B@W as reported by some. I've > had my 4000 for over a year and have been delighted > with it except my dMax on matte B@W do not compare > with the richness and density of my silver B@W. I'd > hate to lose money on my 4000 and spend more $ for the > 4800 only to learn that my gains would be minimal. > Thank you for any consideration. > Joe Davajon > > > > Drop by my site at <davajon.net>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Advice needed... 4000 vs. 4800???
2005-06-08 by Scott Graham
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.