Steve, I haven't used any glop but gloss differential is not obvious as it would be with an RC print. The sheen appears uniform in the landscape prints I've made so far. If you had large areas without ink then you might notice some GD. I purchased the HPR Satin from Lexjet. One other thing I've noticed is some ink rub off in black areas (using MK). I tried using PK, but dmax is too low. So far the best I've been able to get in the dmax department is a 1.72 using MK. Carl On Jun 8, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Steven Karafyllakis wrote: > Hi Carl; > > Sounds very interesting! what does the sheen look like in the > highlight > areas? Are you filling them in with glop? Also: may we know which > dealer has it? Thanks > > Steve Karafyllakis > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield > <scho@m...> wrote: > >> I just tried some of this new Hahnemuhle paper and was very >> impressed. The unprinted Satin has the look and feel of regular >> photo rag, but after printing the printed area develops a slight >> luster sheen. I was printing from a 4000 using QTR and MIS UC >> > inks. > >> The print looks similar to an air dried silver print, with slightly >> less gloss but a more luminous appearance. Very nice and rather >> unique surface. This will be my standard for awhile - no need for >> > k3 > >> inks with this paper. No bronzing, no gloss differential, no >> annoying surface reflections, and no "tacky" RC plastic paper feel. >> The best paper yet for my tastes and needs. >> >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin 308
2005-06-09 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.