Steve - Can you fill me in on the differences you see and like in Premium Semi-Gloss vs. Luster? Up until very recently I have been printing nothing but color, and am just now getting into B&W. For color I have loved Premium Luster, but was wondering what the advantages are with semi-gloss for B&W work? Peter --- Steve Kale <stevekale@...> wrote: Yes. I think one should try it but I don't like collecting boxes of paper that I will eventually never use. I'd recommend that someone wanting to try the paper only request a test pack before buying a box. I have three boxes of SEV in the closet. It's a pity because I do like the finish and it doesn't have the flaking issues of say HPR. And it has a bright looking white. But I have found the blacks to be weak (at least with MIS UC inks on the 2100) and that's a killer for me. They are just so important with B&W (much more so than with colour work). I have for now settled with HPR and Permajet Alpha as my matte papers (each of which I spray with Lascaux Fixative). PA is much warmer than HPR. But since I got my 4800 I much prefer photo paper, specifically Epson Premium Semi Gloss, for B&W. The extra dynamic range is just so compelling. But I won't stop wishing for a better matte black... :-) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW]Epson & Hahnemuhle paper in Australia
2005-06-11 by Peter Johngren
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.