Djon wrote: >I >think this has to do with a pervasive sense that inkjet is inferior as >is, right now. It ain't. It's just different, like etchings or silkscreen. > > The "it's just different" is only partially true. Most traditional media have a look that's hard to emulate with other media, and the emulation will not usually be very successful. For example, oil paints have different characteristics than watercolors. One can try to use one to emulate the other, but it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to achieve an identical looking piece, as long as the original piece used the characteristics of it's medium to full effect. Inkjet prints, on the other hand, can fairly easily be made to look very similar to traditional photographic prints. In fact, according to certain criteria, dmax for example, some inkjets can surpass traditional prints. Inkjet prints can also look quite different from air dried glossy fb silver gelatin prints, but so can other traditional silver gelatin and alternative processes. Traditional photography does not amount to just one look. Hence one need not be "emulating" the look of traditional photography only by preferring non-matte papers. I use the traditional air dried glossy fiber based silver gelatin paper not because others have used it in the past; but because it's dynamic range, range of hues, archivability, surface reflection and other characteristics have in the past best fit the type if image that I've wanted to make. I've tried numerous other traditional processes, and for my work none were as satisfying, but I have nothing against those who use other processes. Since the traditional air dried...silver gelatin paper has best met my needs, when looking for a replacement, it's only natural that I should compare them to that standard, and there's nothing wrong with this, as some seem to suggest. I'm only trying to emulate the look of FB with regards to those characteristics of inkjet printing that aren't as satisfying to me. If possible, I'd like to get injet prints which surpass my FB prints in all of their characteristics. This is not, as some have suggested, trying to get one medium to do something that it's not suited for. With the progress being made with inkjet prints, I have no doubt that my goal will eventually be achieved. Now those who print on matte inkjet papers may have other goals, and that's fine. My goals, though, are not inherently less legitimate than theirs. Like what you like, and let others worry about themselves. -Peter De Smidt
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: the black thing
2005-06-12 by Peter De Smidt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.