Martin, Thanks for your kind offer.I have a dealer here in Toronto with all three of the competing scanners plus the junior Imacon. I am going to spend a day there next week and organize a 'Scan Off". I will report back. David --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > Frank, David, > > If you would like a comparison scan of one of your negs on a Polaroid 120 > let me know off list and I will be happy to run one for you. I have not seen > anything like the pattern in the sky portion of that negative. > > Martin Wesley > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "culturalvisions" <frank@c...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:25 AM > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: review of the Minolti multi pro > > > > Yep, That golf course sky is also the grainy look I get with my > > Minolta Multi Pro. I will be scanning my same problem negs on > > a Nikon 8000 next week. Maybe I'll see more of the same. Frank > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "david_nancy_bogart" > > <david.g.harris@r...> wrote: > > > I am new to this forum and am glad I have found an audience > > for > > > my concerns with my newly acquired Scan Multi Pro. . . . > > namely > > > the grainy look in color negatives. I agree it does > > transparencies > > > very well. > > > > > > I did a scan of a 2 1/4 Reala neg with 50 GEM and still got this > > > grainy look. A friend has posted a 2% slice of a golf course > > > picture shot just after sunrise on an October morning. Here is > > > the URL; > > > > > > > > http://members.rogers.com/dale-cotton/Photos/DHarrisCrop.jpg > > > > > > You can see the 'peppery' look especially in the sky. I'm not so > > > sure it is film grain, or maybe it was originally and the scanning > > > process has accentuated it. Remember you are looking at only > > a > > > 2% slice of the total scan so it seems flat and hazy. But this > > > scene is equivalent to about a 2000mm lens > > > > > > 'Grain' and the scanning times are my only issues. The colors > > > and shadow detail are great and unlike what I had heard, color > > > negs are easy to 'get right' . When I make a 13x19 inkjet of an > > > image it seems sharper than a chemical print from the same > > > negative but unfortunately this sort of 'peppery' look is > > apparent. > > > > > > Anyway, if there are any insights they would be appreciated. > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: review of the Minolti multi pro
2001-12-07 by david_nancy_bogart
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.