Yes, Steve - I'm referring to the MIS UT7 inks. I am currently using them in the C86, including the eboni black. So the crux of my quetion is, does using the 7 inks in the 2200 result in a noticeably better print than the 4 inks in the C86? Thanks for your response, Edward--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "SteveZ" <blizzie12@y...> wrote: > If you are refering to MIS UT7 inks for the 2200 then, yes, > definately. It's worth it. I recently started using them and it's made > all the difference in the world. That ebony black is something else. > You won't need to use QTR, just follow Paul Roark's workflow for the > Epson driver and install his curves. You won't regret it. > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "mastedward" > <nedmast2@a...> wrote: > > I am a b&w photographer currently printing with either a C86 with > MIS > > black/grey inks, or a 2200 using QTR (with Epson color inks). I am > > not > > dissastified with either, but (perhaps I'm getting greedy?!) would I > > gain anyhing by going to the MIS black/grey inks for the 2200? And > > if > > I did that, would I still use QTR? Thanks, Edward
Message
Re: Epson 2200 with MIS inks.
2005-06-24 by mastedward
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.