Paul- Thanks for the paper suggestions. I will look at them. On
the soft proof issue, which I have used for other workflow and like,
I don't believe there's any way to use it with the Epson ABW driver.
So that is why I "tuned" the driver for paper type. Is an ICC
printer profile or RIP really doing anything different from that? Or
are we back to the linearization issue? While I realize that I have
not linearized anything, over a number of images I find the
correspondence between screen and print quite good--paper color and a
reflective surface aside. The highlights, shadows and grayscales
seem about right on the screen (compared to the print) and give me a
very good predictor of the print. Of course, in 40 years I've never
once printed a photograph and had that first print usable. So I have
that experience with the digital flow too. Perhaps I'm just missing
something, because my "flow" seems simplistic (probably downright
useless) to most on the forum.
I tried your links, but they didn't seem to work.
Many thanks,
Walt
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> > ...
> > I started with a 2000P, which I found novel but unusable for
serious
> > printing of anything...
>
> With dedicated B&W inks it can make excellent B&W prints. Among
other
> things, it has one of the best matte paper dmaxs. Since there are
a lot of
> these sitting around gathering dust David Brooks (Shutterbug) asked
me to
> tune a simple monotone inkset for one, which I did. He seems quite
pleased
> with it. My "Readme" file on it is at
> http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/2000P-FS-Readme.htm. Buying a used
2000P is a
> good way for a person who wants 13" B&W to get going on a budget.
>
>
> >...
> >I've settled on the EEM and Velvet (the first for proofing and the
> >second for printing)...
> >Hahnemuhle PR ... seemed ordinary to me ...
> > and I also had ... occassional, small white specks which were
> >not printed. I had this problem with no other papers I tried.
>
> What some call "flaking" of the surface is quite common -- and a
problem.
> As others have noted, it can be reduced by brushing (might leave
markets) or
> blowing with compressed air before printing. Sometimes this isn't
enough.
>
> In general, the sensitivity of inkjet surfaces is a significant
issue and
> problem. I think Epson UltraSmooth (PremierArt Fine Art Hot Press
appears
> to be the same coating) may be the best in this department and also
in the
> fading area. It also has the brightest non-OBA surface (and optical
> brighteners will "burn out" and make the paper appear to be
yellowing).
> With older printers the dmax was slightly weak but acceptable.
With the
> 4800 sample I've seen on PremierArt Hot Press 205 ("PA 205') --
which is a
> real bargain paper -- the dmax was very good. So, you might
consider trying
> this paper. www.ITSupplies.com has the best prices I've seen for
it. See
> <http://www.itsupplies.com/cgi-
bin/itsupplies.storefront/42beea4202f8fae6274
> 0400180140675/Catalog/1518>
>
> Sadly, PermaJet (same as Innova?) coating does not seem to do well
with the
> new Epson printers. For pre-2400 models, this line is near the top
of my
> paper list.
>
> >...
> > My first prints on the 2400 did not match the monitor...
>
> That is typical with B&W printing. Some of us use the Photoshop
soft
> proofing procedure Photoshop provides. I have the procedure
written up at
> http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Monitor-Profiling.htm.
>
> Frankly, I'm surprised Epson set up a separate B&W procedure. At
some point
> the B&W and color workflows have to be integrated. The amount of
color
> pigments fed into the image should be seamless from pure carbon to
high
> gamut color. As such, I see the latest Epsons as a timid first
step, but
> still, by integrating what the third party rips have been doing
into the
> driver and adding a lighter gray, they've opened the market up to
those who
> won't try third party solutions -- which, of course, is where the
> innovations have come from.
>
> Good luck with your B&W printing and welcome to the forum.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.comMessage
[Digital BW] Re: Espon R2400 - My take.
2005-06-26 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.