Steve, Just printed a Printer White Point Target from www.ZuberPhotographics.com with and without the Highlight Point Shift box checked. Without it checked, as you say, 255 is the same as the paper (Premium Glossy) and 254 can be seen to be different. With it checked, the whole of the printable area becomes glossier, and 255 is no different from that. The points 254 and below are still distinguishable from 255, so the linearity of these lighter points has been shifted. Presumably the highlight tonality slider does the same sort of thing - haven't tried that yet. The Printer Black Point Target is also useful for checking the black end-point, which on this first print (using the Neutral/Darker default setting for B&W) looks rather high. I'll try some more with the other four Tone settings and the Shadow tonality slider. As far as I am aware there is no BO setting (1 or 3) on the R2400. For those who haven't seen the Advanced B&W settings on the R2400, there are four Color Tones to choose from Neutral, Warm, Cool, and Sepia; five Tone settings Darkest, Darker, Dark, Normal, and Light; and sliders for Brightness, Contrast, Highlight Tonality, Shadow Tonality, and Max Optical Density; as well as a Color Wheel for tinting, and the Highlight Point Shift checkbox already mentioned. So there are plenty of adjustments that can be made. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Kale" <stevekale@...> Ah. Thanks for pointing that out - I had simply overlooked it. Yes the 4800 has the same check box. I wonder how much the whites get clipped if you check that box. I'll have to play with it when I get a chance. I have not used it. In the 256 step wedges I printed one can just see that there is ink laid down at patch 254 and the difference between 252 and paper white is easily discernible. The only issue I had ever noticed with gloss differential on photo paper was when I had blown a small portion of an image to pure white against a solid black background. In that image, if I tilted it severely (to an impractical viewing angle) I could see the gloss differential between the paper and the surrounding ink and because it was in the centre of the image it was noticeable. I doubt I would find cause to check that box - and I think I would rather control the clipping with a curve or levels adjustment. One would never use it for matte paper output. I wonder if the images that Clayton saw were printed with this box checked...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Advanced B&W - was 4800 v. UT7 1600 dpi scans
2005-06-28 by Bob Frost
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.