Paul,
Thanks for the clarification on the MIS LKN ink design. It sounds
like there is no escaping the use of toners - either via a RIP with
cyan and magenta or through the use of additional toned gray inks in
order to maintain a consistent, neutral grayscale. I was looking for
an FSN type result, but with only two gray inks (K+LK) and this seems
to be possible only if the LK is tailored to a specific paper, which
makes sense.
Carl
On Jun 28, 2005, at 8:28 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> Carl,
>
>
>> ... I'm not happy with the MIS
>> UT7 LK that I've been using in my 4000 because I've been getting hue
>> shifts (towards yellow) when printing for neutral and I have to add
>> LM and LC to get neutrality. The whole point of switching to the UT7
>> LK was to avoid toning with the cyan and magenta inks, but It doesn't
>> work.
>>
>
> The UT7 LK(N) was mixed only to give more neutral shadows when the
> 2200
> Epson driver was used in slider mode. It is not an appropriate mix
> for a
> mid-tone neutral ink.
>
>
>> Using a 50:50 mix of UT7 LC and LM position grays gets me a
>> more neutral composite gray in my 2200
>>
>
> That is exactly as it should be. These inks are equal in density
> to about a
> 50% dilution of LK. I would expect the Epson lightest ink to be at
> least a
> 30% dilution of LK. That is about the dilution from PK to LK in
> MIS inks.
>
> I'm starting to use FS-Y (the same density as the old PiezoBW
> lightest --
> Y-position -- ink) in my UT7 setup to get the smoothest highlights
> possible.
> But, its dilution is closer to the equivalent of only 8% LK. The
> density-pigment load (dilution) curve is very non-linear near the
> ends.
>
>
>> I would also like to have a MATCHED, NEUTRAL K and LK ...
>>
>
> The problem is that the same ratio of MIS R800 Blue to 7600 Cyan
> ("RB:C"
> ratio) changes as one moves up the scale. If one uses a static mix
> like the
> UT1 toner, which was made for quad printers, what looks best at the
> 50%
> patch will look very magenta in the shadows of many papers.
> Counteracting
> this magenta bias of the shadows is why the LKN was mixed the way
> it was.
>
> For those using LK as the neutral and highlight ink, the color ink
> mix (RB:C
> ratio) should be like the UT1 toner. That is what the UT2 and UT7
> cold
> light gray inks use. The darker cold grays, however, have a
> different color
> mix.
>
> (Carl, if you wanted to try an educated "shot-in-the-dark" LKN-2
> mix with
> the standard midtone color mix, I could send you a bottle.
> However, I don't
> have the time right now to do the testing needed to get the gamut
> such that
> it would match PKN right on. Then again, it would be different for
> different papers anyway. That's a major reason why I prefer a
> variable-tone
> approach.)
>
> My next ink project is to focus on control of the shadows for my
> upgraded
> 7600 UT7, since that can now be done with a rip. That is, I'll add
> control
> of the green-magenta axis in the shadows, as well as the current
> carbon
> (yellow)-blue axis. This project is going to have to wait until late
> August, however.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] New LK-N (was Re: 4800 v. UT7 1600 dpi scans)
2005-06-29 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.