Carl, > ... It sounds like there is no escaping the use of toners - > either via a RIP with cyan and magenta or through the use >of additional toned gray inks in order to maintain a consistent, >neutral grayscale. I think that is correct with what we're currently doing. "Consistent" and "neutral" are what make it more work. The eye is very sensitive to color shifts around the neutral zone, and consistency is not the first thing that comes to mind with respect some of our materials. > I was looking for an FSN type result, but with only two gray inks >(K+LK) That is easy, but FSN was neither neutral nor consistent. Seriously, I can mix you an LK-N2 that will allow you to match the UT-FSN tones in about 15 minutes. If the mix looks good, MIS will make and sell it. I see the need for such an ink. > and this seems to be possible only if the LK is tailored to a specific > paper, which makes sense. Well, now you're asking for something beyond FSN or any monotone -- thus my late August project to get the second axis under control sufficiently so we can profile more papers and significantly correct for the inconsistencies of our materials. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] New LK-N (was Re: 4800 v. UT7 1600 dpi scans)
2005-06-29 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.