Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] 2200 says "no ink here" but there is!

2005-06-30 by Walt Mucha

>
>The 2400 looks good but does it do BO?  I've been reading
here that it
>doesn't seem to and who kows how well the OE 3 ink BW prints
are .
>
>I'll take this thread of topic sort of.   I love BO prints.  UT7
>gives/gave me a color option but since I scan film, TX and
TMZ 3200
>the differences in BO and UT7 to me aren't all that great.
>
>I just started shooting with a D70.  Now the difference in a
BO and a
>UT7 print from a source where grain never existed is very
much more
>obvious.
>
>I like BO, clients like UT7.  BO is Rodinal 1:50, UT7 is Microdal
>undiluted on Plus-X.  Never liked the latter.

The reports I've read on the 4800, which is the 2400's big
brother, seem to say that the B&W prints are stunning. You
also have the advantage of fine tuning the color from cool to
warm and sepia and just about anywhere in between so you might
want to look into the 2400 further. The price is around the
same as a 2200 refurb. I had a similar problem as yours on my
7600 and one of the pins that contact the chip was broken on
the backside. Fortunately I had a week left on my warranty

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.