I forgot the reference... http://www.normankoren.com/digital_tonality.html And will end it there... :-) > From: Steve Kale <stevekale@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 21:58:14 +0100 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Artifacts with Digital images > > Yes I guess this is a bit off this topic but there is an interesting > discussion here from which I conclude we want greater bit depth and lower > noise - the latter being highly correlated to the size of the pixel. All > else being equal (including noise), greater bit depth increases dynamic > range. This is a big "sales point" for the digital backs that are true 16 > bit. Anyway the point of the matter is there is more to a digital camera > than the number of pixels as we all know. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Artifacts with Digital images
2005-07-02 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.