Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Artifacts with Digital images

2005-07-02 by Steve Kale

I forgot the reference...

http://www.normankoren.com/digital_tonality.html

And will end it there...  :-)

> From: Steve Kale <stevekale@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 21:58:14 +0100
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Artifacts with Digital images
> 
> Yes I guess this is a bit off this topic but there is an interesting
> discussion here from which I conclude we want greater bit depth and lower
> noise - the latter being highly correlated to the size of the pixel.  All
> else being equal (including noise), greater bit depth increases dynamic
> range.  This is a big "sales point" for the digital backs that are true 16
> bit.  Anyway the point of the matter is there is more to a digital camera
> than the number of pixels as we all know.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.