A very worthwhile article. I have met Mac Holbert, these people are obviously committed to fine printing. An interesting aspect of the article, as Bruce Watson's reply indicates, is that other alternative solutions to the problem are never mentioned. It's very obvious that there is a good working relationship between Nash and Epson. I doubt 9800s have been shipped to many people for evaluation that don't have such a relationship. Therefore only solutions provided by, and none frowned upon, by Epson are discussed. For example, a quick check with a few old members on this list and he wouldn't have wasted his time testing a 2000 or 9500. Though Mac may have experimented with all kinds of approaches, when it comes to writing articles or making recommendations, I doubt his organization will jeopardize a relationship with Epson that is so rewarding to them. There are very few printers in this country of Mac's stature, and I don't intend to suggest I'm in a position to question his word. But I want to stress again- there are options, some extremely successful, some that even helped lead the way to slow improvement in these out-of-the-box improvements. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@p...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Elwood Spedden <elwood@w...> > wrote: > > Martin > > > > Do you have a link for the Black & White Chronicles? > > Woody > > Here you go, Woody > > http://photoshopnews.com/2005/07/02/black-white-chronicles/ > > Ed
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Imageprint RIP/2200/2400/4800
2005-07-04 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.