Clayton Jones wrote: > I hope these will give some ideas. I'd be interested in whatever you > find out. Clayton, thanks for the thorough reply. It gave me several ideas about how to attack this issue, and I'm pleased to report I've solved the problem. Making a long story short, after several blind alleys I got even more suspicious of dither artifacts when earlier today I reprinted an image that I had successfully printed a couple weeks ago. This print came out fine, which suggested to me that nothing was physically wrong with the printer, and that it wasn't a mysterious software change that had led to problems. But I did notice that this print's source file was around 500 dpi. So I printed some test strips. The ones at 360 dpi and 720 dpi looked fine. The one at 320 dpi was banded in all but the darkest zones - or maybe it is more correct to say the banding was variably visible, being most visible in tones from just below middle gray almost to white. Anyway, that seemed pretty diagnostic to me. I resampled my troublesome image using the s spline from 320 dpi to 720 dpi. I printed it out and it looks great. I went back to the original 320 dpi file, and resampled it to 360 dpi. Printed it, and I can't tell the difference from the 720 dpi version. I reprinted the original 320 dpi file without changing it, and it is banded all to hell again. I'm concluding that this printing system appears to be sensitive to the source file's linear resolution. I'm not sure in what way, because I haven't done enough tests - and I probably won't bother, I prefer to just raise the flag of victory and enjoy my ability to print. But I wonder whether 320 is a magic number where you get a poor print with this system, or whether the dither algorithm works best at multiples of 80 dpi and hence there are a lot of sub-optimal magic numbers, or what. I also don't know whether this is idiosyncratic of my system specifically, or whether it is an attribute of all C86's used this way. Anyway, I throw this out for those who might encounter the problem in the future. Paul Roark, thanks to you also for the help you gave me off-list. -- Jeff Medkeff Eagle River, Alaska
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: C86 - EZN horizontal banding
2005-07-05 by Jeff Medkeff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.