May I reply to my own post to add this link http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/digital.signal.to.noise/ which is certainly very interesting. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "kenstrain2000" <kenstrain2000@y...> wrote: > > > Two thoughts:- > > 1) The big unknown here seems to be the noise in the readout amplifier > under real operating conditions. (The properties of sensor itself can > be guessed more easily as the physics is simple.) The amplifier noise > sets the balance between readout time and dynamic range. Astro CCDs > read fewer pixels much more slowly to reduce the effect of readout > noise. I like the fast readout provided by my camera:) > I guess that the manufacturers take a system design approach to the > problem of handling the image information as it passes through > lens/microlens/filters/sensor/readout/gain/digitisation, balancing the > noise at each stage against cost, time to save image, etc. I don't > believe the ADC is the hardest part of the problem, and suspect that > extra bits would be used if they gave better images (at least in >$1k > cameras). Of course there is still room for improvement in all areas, > but it might not be very rapid. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Artifacts with Digital images
2005-07-05 by kenstrain2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.