PC's (and some minis/workstations) have been this way. A standard bus architecture, some boot firmware and then a horizontal, component oriented industry. Separates alot of engineering and manufacturing (e.g., Intel, nVidia, Seagate, etc.) from marketing/logistics/fulfillment (e.g., Dell et al). I don't know if the economics make it worthwhile (vs. the computer industry), but if one of the big computer chip houses got into making sensors, things might well shape up like this someday. Scott Clayton Jones wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > >>...if a sensor were made specifically for B&W... > > >...Such sensors are made by the thousands... > > I'd like to share my personal pet prediction. This is not based on > any technical knowledge, just pure hunch and speculation. I've had > this idea for over a year and it won't go away. I predict that > someday we'll have cameras with switchable plug-in sensors. Here's > why: > > To me the biggest difference from film is that we could put any film > we wanted in our cameras - a huge range of choices. With digi we're > stuck with whatever we get. That is an enormous restriction, > especially for such expensive cameras. > > Makers must constantly evolve their products to compete. Where will > they go? Someone pointed out that once the MP race hits diminishing > returns they'll turn to improving the DR and other attributes of the > sensors themselves. I agree, but what comes after that? > > I think that someone eventually will design a plugin sensor that will > have a standard pinout, at least within their own cameras. They will > make several sensors, just a few at first; color and BW. It > will evolve to having choices of different MP sizes with > correspondingly different size wells, with correspondingly different > noise and DR ratings (since all the sensors will be the same size). > Perhaps even different BW sensitivities such as IR and panchromatic. > > Each plugin sensor package will of necessity carry its own onboard > firmware. The camera will just have enough image processing code to > trigger the sensor logic and transfer the data to the memory card > (which might mean lower "body only" camera prices). This means the > sensor processing firmware will have a standard API. > > A standard pinout and API will open up a vigorous 3rd party market for > sensors for these cameras (think Sony, Matsushita and Kodak), and > we'll eventually have a large range of choices. > > The first company to make such a camera will likely sell tons of cams > (especially if they work behind the scenes with 3p sensor makers so > there is a wider range of sensors out of the starting gate) because > the benefits will be obvious. I predict K-M will do it because > Minolta has always been innovative. Other makers will have to folow > suit, and it's possible the pinout and API will become industry-wide > (that one I'm not so sure about, but what a huge difference it would > make - the 3p sensor industry would be enormous). > > This will most likely take some years to happen, but I think it's > inevitable. > > NOTE: I cringe in fear that by posting this I will start a huge thread > in this forum. I hope not. I hope people will just think about it > and put it away to wait and see if it ever happens. Please use > restraint and don't have a long drawn out discussion of these ideas. > I'm sharing this because it fascinates me and I think others here may > appreciate it - but this is supposed to be a printing forum. > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from > the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the > Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd > AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE > LOSSES (EVEN IF THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), > RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF > YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD > PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > * Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint>" on > the web. > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] "Digital ZS" - The Future (?)
2005-07-10 by Scott McLoughlin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.