I wonder how many black only users will want to go through the hassle of learning QTR to simply drive one black ink? I suspect that a key advantage for many will be gone - simplicity. I am sure that there will be some that will go to the extra trouble to keep the "look" but I doubt most will. I agree with the statistically insignificant numbers but suspect that their only hope of having Epson preserve their workflow is by telling Epson and not just venting here. > From: Danny Culbertson <danculb@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:14:21 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 says "no ink here" but there is - BO? > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale > <stevekale@b...> wrote: >> Your "best bet" is to make yourself heard at Epson. I have no > doubt that >> without substantial feedback black only will not be available on > any future >> Epson printer with more than one shade of K... > > > Maybe I missed something in the discussion but near as I can tell > from QTR for the 2200 it is very easily to set up a simple black- > only curve with no light gray ink and no toning. Just go to curve > creation and set black to "gray ink" at 100% and set everything else > to "not used" save that as "BO" and call it up as the curve. Seemed > pretty simple to me. Even when I didn't linearize the printer it > printed a pretty fair gray ramp with only the one ink. Surely that > will be available on future QTR versions for the 4800 et. al. So > while it does seem strange to me that Epson would can the BO mode in > its drivers I don't see why this would be all that huge an issue for > us special purpose users. Why wouldn't one just use QTR for BO > mode? Cheap enough. > > I suspect there are not enough BO users in the entire world to make > any statistically significant difference in Epson sales no matter > how much fuss they make. > > Dan
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 says "no ink here" but there is - BO?
2005-07-13 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.