--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Savoia <mark@c...> wrote: > Thanks. Does Jon state that too? Seems like he is pushing "stay away > from anything except museum black". > Mark I think it's because the newest "official" methods of printing with his inks... StudioPrint profiles with the Epson RGB driver ImagePrint (barely aproved anymore?) ...do not allow a supporting ink underprint like the old plugin or pro24 RIP did. You can, however, do it with StudioPrint. It's not really mentioned anywhere that I'm aware of, and it's not variable, but it's doable. Other options like QTR or IJC/OPM would let you underink too. But with no underink, original tonal relationships will be best maintained over time with Museum K. However, I know folks like yourself that have been using PortfolioK since it came out, with no underink, with Prints wearing very well. Who knows, I've had old Piezography ink prints on my walls for years, that get a lot of open daylight (no direct sun) that still look great. I suspect they will still look great for many years to come. Tyler
Message
[Digital BW] Re: portfolio black fading
2005-07-14 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.