Digital BW, The Print

Another difference--there is the third black in the 2400.  FYI, the 
2400 uses inks (for "neutral," BW, matte prints) in the following 
order:  LLK, MK, LK, LC, LM, Y -- at least in my experience with a 
few hundred prints.  So, I assume the dithering (etc.) is different 
from a two-ink printer.  I haven't done measurements of ink use, but 
I find it prodigious.  I don't think a 13x19, however, uses anything 
like $4 of ink.  (I am particularly irked by the use of C and M in 
the cleaning cycles and have already replaced both cartridges.)  All 
that said, I'm crazy about the printer.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "mxgo95747" 
<mxgo95747@y...> wrote:
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Mr_Misty_44" 
<jharvey@i...> 
> wrote:
> > Has anyone with a 2200 and a 2400 done any side by sides of the 
same 
> > image. I'm using QTR with my 2200 and would like to know if there 
is a 
> > difference between prints using this or IJC and the Epson Driver 
with 
> > the 2400? For that matter a 2400 using QTR.
> > 
> > John H
> 
> Amen!  Especially for matte papers, since both use the same matte 
ink. For matte papers 
> does the hardware of 2400 make a difference over a 2200 with a RIP?
> 
> Martin