>They should be called inkjet prints, that's what they are. If further >elaboration by inclusion of materials like carbon or process like >quadtone are added that's fine, as it informs. Szarkowski calls my prints "ink prints" which seems be far the best, most succinct and accurate description I've encountered Just as we often say "silver prints" "platinum prints" etc - after that we can add our little comments in brackets or whatever (carbon pigment, ultrachrome, quadtone etc etc) It's becoming my standard descriptor for now tim a
Message
Re: Bill Brandt "carbon prints" Los Angeles
2005-07-26 by Timothy Atherton