It's not often that I find myself able to contribute anything useful to this forum. I simply don't do enough printing. But I can suggest with reasonable authority (my Bachelor's degree was Classics): atramento sparso Doesn't sound as good as the previous suggestion (maybe like you're skimping on something), but the grammar is correct :-) Being very much an amateur I'm happy to say that most people I show prints to don't care about how they're made, or what they're made from. They just look at the picture. Sometimes they're interested whether they're digital or 'real photos'. But that's about as far as it goes. What I think is great is that I can produce archival prints without having to worry about whether my fixer was off or my bottle of selenium toner is too old. For someone doing irregular darkroom work this works out quite expensive. And there were always too many other things to worry about. Anyway, as more people produce great work using this medium I'm sure acceptance will build. Good luck Chris --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dfaprinting" <dfaprinting@y...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" > <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > > That's a great idea, we could use latin. What is the latin word for > inkjet? > > > > I'm sure we can all agree on it, right? > > > > > > > > Actually, after looking up the words, I kind of like it. Pulled from > the dictionary at: > http://catholic.archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin/lookdown.pl > > atramentum aspergo [black fluid , such as ink or shoemaker's black]& > [spray] > > The grammar may actually be correct too.
Message
Re: Latin name - was- Bill Brandt "carbon prints" Los Angeles
2005-07-27 by c_h_r_i_s_e_l_l_i_s
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.