>Wow, I go away for a year, and you guys are still talking about >what to call your prints! Has anyone in the current incarnation of this subject read the "What To Call Them?" article at http://www.cjcom.net/articles/digiprn6.htm Among other things, it touches on the (now very old and long died away) "carbon print" controversy: "The term "Carbon Pigment Print", often used today to describe fine art black and white inkjet prints, seems to have evolved out of the controversy that sprang up after some inkjet people used the term "Carbon Print", and the people working in the old carbon print processes took offense that their name was being hijacked." This battle raged for months across numerous forums, and when the dust finally settled there seemed to be a tacit agreement throughout the inkjet community that "carbon print" was off limits, but things like "Carbon Pigment Print" and "Carbon Ink Print" are ok. I guess history has to repeat itself. BTW, the article makes a case for using "Carbon Ink Print", but I did not invent the term. It was one of several I saw used during The Great Carbon Print Debate. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: Bill Brandt "carbon prints" Los Angeles
2005-07-27 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.