Digital BW, The Print

> misinterpreted Roy's intent, and change his article appropriately
> without waiting for action on Roy's part. For that matter, I'd expect
> that Keith, by now, would be making some effort to contact Roy
> _directly_ for clarification.
> 
> Phil
Hi

I'm afraid I stick by how I describe the QTR structure. It is clear for anyone to read when 
they download and/or install the s/w ... it is not for me to interpret intent. And let me say 
_again_ it is well worth $50!

However for all those people intent on seeing me as trying to bilk some poor developer 
out of his well earned dues, I'd say that I sent a mail to Roy when I first published the 
review inviting comment on the QTR aspect of the review. I am always happy to correct 
mistakes but only when I hear from the horses mouth so to speak.

So to all of you having a slight dig at my integrity I stick my tongue out at you! :-) :-)
To those thanking me for the article or mailing me to agree with how I covered QTR 
thanks!

High price lawyer indeed -- I'll choose to take that as a complement since we don't have 
such a plague of them here in the UK :-) ... I'm a photographer now and the business suits 
have sat in my wardrobe for several years.

bye for now

Keith :-)