Colin- Unfortunately my experience with UC ink is the same...both with QTR and Image Print. I mentioned this to the folks at lexjet who responded with a bunch of emails from people who love it. I told them they were wrong and they asked for some samples of the prints I made. When they got them, they emailed me and asked me what I didn't like about them !!!! ???? Too bad...the surface feels great and can deal with handling much better than HPR, I'm waiting to see what comes from lexjet. They indicated they were working with Image Print and "others" to try to tweak the profiles. cheers, Tom O'Connell --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "colingruk" <cconway@b...> wrote: > A dealer has set up in northern Greece importing Hahnemuele, Moab, > and some other papers. Stocks and range are limited but I bought a > 50 sheet box of A3+ (SuperB?) Photorag Satin for Euro 282 (US$344), > as they had no A3. > > I recently printed a sunrise image of Queen Victoria at Bryce taken > this spring on William Turner using BO that I will enter for the next > UK print exchange. I printed this image on my 1290 using UT2 and > Eboni, neutral setting with PR curve. It was dreadful! A metallic > sheen from whichever whichway I viewed it. QTR users seem to like > the paper but has anyone successfully used it with UT2? If so how > did they do it? > > I printed the image as BO and found the velvet setting for this image > better than the others, and I am really impressed. But how to use > this paper for other techniques, including (sorry OT) colour? > > It is so expensive to test on, so some help would be appreciated. > > Cheers, > > Colin
Message
Re: Expensive mistake? Photorag Satin
2005-08-02 by Tom OConnell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.