I don't know, or particularly care, who is right about the QTR license agreement. I've used QTR to make exactly one print, as a test for a dither banding problem using another product, and then uninstalled it (which is easier said than done, incidentally - it leaves droppings all over the system). That doesn't exactly put me in a position of liability, and I have no particular interest in QTR since I'm not a user. But I can say that when proponents of one side of an argument are incapable of being civil or resisting the temptation to fling snide insults, I'm uninclined to credit that side with any particular virtue. When such mobs are right, it is usually by coincidence, their position having been arrived at by irrational methods - with hysteria and much shouting. To be subjected to this kind of irrelevant, atopical excresence is not the reason I'm here. Tom OConnell wrote: > maybe Roy should just put some code in that requires activation and > payment after 50 days or your hard drive is erased !!! So QTR users advocate criminal behaviour, and believe QTR should be dangerous to use. That makes the product look *really* attractive. I think if I ever need a RIP, QTR is one that I'll *run* from, if only to avoid this kind of association. -- Jeff Medkeff Eagle River, Alaska
Message
Re: [Digital BW] QTR fees
2005-08-02 by Jeff Medkeff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.