--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom OConnell" <tomoc@y...> wrote: > Colin- > > Unfortunately my experience with UC ink is the same...both with QTR > and Image Print. I mentioned this to the folks at lexjet who > responded with a bunch of emails from people who love it. I told them > they were wrong and they asked for some samples of the prints I made. > When they got them, they emailed me and asked me what I didn't like > about them !!!! ???? > > Too bad...the surface feels great and can deal with handling much > better than HPR, I'm waiting to see what comes from lexjet. They > indicated they were working with Image Print and "others" to try to > tweak the profiles. > > cheers, > > Tom O'Connell > Tom, The differential sheen is so marked that it is readily apparent even looking straight on. It is just horrible. How anyone cannot see it straight off is beyond me. I have posted two copies of the image to the dealer, one on PR and the other on PR Satin for his comments, both using UT2. I have made no observations of my own. I will print a step wedge using BO (Eboni)at the weekend if I have the time and hope to confirm my favourable impression of the result. The paper finish is, I think, lovely albeit with a warm tone, but it would be a shame if I could only use it for BO. Is there anyone else out there having success or failure? Colin
Message
Re: Expensive mistake? Photorag Satin
2005-08-02 by colingruk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.