Fact is I'm sure there are plenty of people who have both of these inksets out there to compare, especilly with the 22/2400 machines. The problem is getting someone who is using the QTR rip to have them both. Roy does. We're not talking about the Epson driver here. I would expect a big improvement over that original sad system they were using that sucked so bad. That is precisely why we abandoned it in the first place. They couldn't even make generic color profils that were usable. As far as software goes Epson is playing catch up at best. John > If you do not feel you have enough feedback/comments from that which has > been discussed on this forum and the various reviews I would suggest you > need to run your own test and make your own judgements. > > Cheers > > Steve > > > > From: Mr_Misty_44 <jharvey@i...> > > > > > Steve, > > > > This is all very fine but I still would like to hear what the > > same image printed on the same paper looks like coming from a 2200 > > using UltraCrome inks and QTR or IJC or ImagePrint (I happen to use > > QTR) compaired to the 2400 using the ABW Epson Driver and K3 inks. > > Side by side what does someone think. Is there a definate difference > > between one and another. What is it. Is it an improvement. Someone > > please do this simple exercise if you happen to have both printers. > > It could be a 4000 vs 4800, or a 7600 vs...)Please the same 1440 as > > well. > > > > John H
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 2400 Vs. 2200 (4800 vs 4000, 7800 vs.......)
2005-08-10 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.