Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale
<stevekale@b...> 
wrote:
>
> 
> I have the 2100 and bought the 4800.  I think I have made it pretty
clear as
> to what I think of the differences (same image on the 2100 with MIS
inks or
> Epson UCs vs the 4800 with K3 inks) on photo paper.  The K3s, while
not
> perfect, kill everything before it.  The differences on matte are
much less
> discernible and probably significantly more subjective. The retained
> weakness of Epson MK vs MIS Eboni has been discussed.  The
differences with
> respect to ease of use have also been made clear.
> 
>> Cheers
> 
> Steve
> 
>

Hi Steve, I think your statement ("the differences on matte are much
less
 discernible and probably significantly more subjective. The retained
 weakness of Epson MK vs MIS Eboni has been discussed".) pretty much
says it for me.   

If you print on matte papers, with the RIPs, profiles, Piezo K7 inks,
MIS inks, Paul' work, 
and refillable cartridges that are on the market, the Epson 2200
might be the best choice 
for those individuals.  I am sure that it will be quite a while
before the Epson 2400 has all 
the above after market choices.


Thanks,

Martin