Thanks.I don't think we can expect the Holy Grail of tonality this year. I would be curious to hear what people think about output from the exact same files on the same machine with these two inksets. john --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, guy washburn <guido02474@y...> wrote: > According to Fedex tracking my 2200 k7 set should be > here today. I have some more prints I need to finish > with my current UC setup, but I should have a > datapoint for folks by early next week at the latest. > > Guy > > --- Chris Hargens <chargens@s...> wrote: > > > I'm surprised too. I've also looked in vain for a > > review of the k7 > > inkset on the piezography3000 group -- nothing more > > than this: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/piezography3000/message/26645 > > You'd think that some of the beta testers or advance > > users would be > > offering at least some information about the > > strengths and weakness of > > K7. Perhaps not many people have tried it yet, and, > > like me, they're > > waiting for a thumbs up or down. > > > > Chris Hargens > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > > "john dean" > > <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > > To tell you the truth the Piezzo site is not > > exactly > > > exploding with knowledge and enthuasism. And, now > > that the new neutral > > > inkset is out I'm surprised of that fact. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 2400 Vs. 2200 (4800 vs 4000, 7800 vs.......)
2005-08-10 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.