--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > ...To tell you the truth the Piezzo site is not exactly > exploding with knowledge and enthuasism. Yes, it has been remarkably quiet. I've been on that list since it's inception in 2000, it does ebb and flow, and generally not have much activity. It seems busiest when there are problems, and very quiet when things seem to be working well. It is not a very social list. I too have been wanting to hear from beta testers, other than my one friend. ... > ...My big curiosity about the Tyler mono > approach is will it go K7 or stay with Piezzo Quad and toning > alterations. I suspect the latter. I could be wrong, but I sense you > are already working with a system that is hard to beat for this type > of work. I'm very happy with it, and what clients I have are happy as well, a change would be very difficult. If I had an extra 7 ink printer around I'd be into K7 playing in a hearbeat though. Jon has assured us that the Piezotone line will remain viable and available for a long long time. Cone Editions uses it in house, obvioulsy. In this printing world we are all in here, it's very difficult to commit to one process enough to master it, yet be in a position to quickly evolve as well. Things move fast around here. Tyler
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 2400 Vs. 2200 (4800 vs 4000, 7800 vs.......)
2005-08-10 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.