--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., SKID Photography <skid@b...> wrote: > antonisphoto wrote: (snip) > > > > Does reflecting all this UV make a paper more or less archival? More > > because UV is not absorbed, or less because the brightners will kill the paper > > in due time. > > Too bad EAM is relegated to proofing paper.Without the brighteners it may > > have been a better color match to the piezo inks and unbeatable for the price. > > But now it just acquired a whole new (dark)life! > > > > Antonis > > Actually, I think the glowing is a sign of the instability caused by the optical brighteners. The act of the > 'fluorescing' is actually the OBs breaking down and being used up. :- ) > > Sorry I wasn't there for the event, would have loved to have seen the glowing prints. > > > Harvey Ferdschneider Antonis, Harvey, From Robert Reed of Crane Papers posts earlier this is exactly what happens. There is a chemical reaction that takes place in the OBA's causing them to emit light in addition to what they reflect. Once exhausted the paper will appear to have yellowed. Paul Roark has noted this in his fade testing. Robert was going to check with Crane's brain trust to see if the OBA's did anything bad once they were consumed but I don't recall any info on this. Martin
Message
Re: Unexpected fun use for EAM...
2001-12-15 by mwesley3
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.