Digital BW, The Print

Yeah, I forgot to mention that, but from my stated impressions, one
can probably assume I use the coated papers, and they would be
correct. Specifically, luster and semigloss. I used matte and art
papers for a while, but went back to the coated for the more
photo-like appearence. Also, does anyone have any experience using
semimatte paper? what is the surface like? more matte or more luster?

Ben 

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "mxgo95747"
<mxgo95747@y...> wrote:
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "bghess_sp"
<bghess_sp@y...> 
> wrote:
> > Just installed the 4800 - simply amazing. Fast, quiet, BIG. I've been
> > using a 2200 with MIS UT7 inks up to this point. Initial comparison of
> > a print that I thought looked great with MIS - doesn't really compare
> > to the K3 ABW print. Blacks are blacker, tonal gradation is smoother,
> > just an all around better looking print. Asthetically, which is what I
> > think the original question on this thread was asking, the K3 print
> > looks a lot better. This is out of the box, too. B&W printing just got
> > a whole lot better, not to mention easier (a hell of a lot more
> > expensive, too!)
> 
> Paper?
> 
> Martin