Digital BW, The Print

Thanks Paul!  But I don't quite understand the reply.  I have results 
from the original VM neutralinks/curves, am I to understand that on EEM 
the UT-FSN will be cooler than the VM-N was?  If I go with the UT-FSN I 
would probably be printing on Moab Entrada Bright White or Natural if I 
went with the UT-FS.  From my VM experience, I found that the MW or W 
curves didn't nessacrily work better, but that the warm tone made for a 
much more forgiving print when it came to posterization etc... in truth 
I'd prefer a harsher neutral print if my 1160 is capable of producing 
smooth gradients with no posterizations using the UT-FSN inkset.

mark

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Mark,
> 
> > 
> > I am going to try out one of the UT inksets ...
> > How does it compare to the old VM neutral results?
> 
> It depends on the paper.  With EEM it's a bit cool; on PhotoRag, it 
should
> be "neutral" (C = Y) with a slight "selenium" look (M elevated 0.01 
density
> unit). 
> 
> The UT-FS and UT-FSN inks can be mixed to get the tone you're after.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com