Which Kodak paper did you use: Premium or Professional? I got a sample of the Kodak Professional Luster from Kodak directly. I printed some color photos on the paper and was really impressed, since I wasn't using custom profile, only the profile from Kodak. Longevity is a big concern though. By the way, I was using Epson inks in the R800, fwiw. Scott --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > > > HP Premium Plus Photo Paper should be the only paper to use with an > > HP photo printer if you expect longevity. > > > > In March 2004 I fade tested the HP B&W ink on HP, Ilford Classic Pearl, and > Kodak's latest paper at the time. They were all close, with the HP paper > having a very slight edge in the midtones, and Kodak having a slightly > better dmax after the fade test. (The Ilford 100% patch actually increased > in density, but it was significantly lower to start with.) I generally > concluded the swellable papers on the market are close to the same and all > very good considering the inks are dyes. (They are still not in the same > league with carbon, however.) > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?
2005-08-14 by scott_now_coming
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.