Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-12 by Scott McLoughlin

Below, this was a post from an HP user on the LUG. Wondering about
whether this will apply to Kirkland Paper + MIS inks or the UC
inks?

Scott
------

I've been printing B&W prints with Kirkland glossy paper from Costco for about six months now using a HP 7690 and their grey/black carts.  There has been a noticable fade towards yellow/green in the B&W images I have had sitting on a mantlepiece in our living room (no direct sunlight, prints unframed).  Similar prints on HP's top of the line glossy paper have had no fading at all that I can see.  As much as I hate to say it, the combination of ink and paper really does matter.  I would caution all of those expecting some sort of image stability from ink-jet prints to test carefully under display conditions (particularly with the inks being as expensive as they are).

Re: Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-12 by Mark Hahn

I wouldn't trust that paper for anything.  At a county fair recently 
my young daughter begged me to waste $10 getting a photo of her done 
with a giant python.  I looked over and saw a couple 7690s and a box 
of HP Premium Plus Glossy and figured... well, at least it will 
last.  I paid my money AND THEN saw the Kirkland box.  Put the photo 
on the mantle for two weeks and it faded to orange (accerated due to 
running the swamp cooler)... that's dye etc... but still.  Aside from 
not being waterproof, the HP Premium Plus is an excellent glossy 
paper.

I don't understand being cheap with paper... if you are selling the 
output, a buck or so shouldn't cut into your profits and if it is 
done just for personal reasons, why bother produce junk... just my 
opinion...

mark

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Scott McLoughlin 
<scott@a...> wrote:
> Below, this was a post from an HP user on the LUG. Wondering about
> whether this will apply to Kirkland Paper + MIS inks or the UC
> inks?
> 
> Scott
> ------
> 
> I've been printing B&W prints with Kirkland glossy paper from 
Costco for about six months now using a HP 7690 and their grey/black 
carts.  There has been a noticable fade towards yellow/green in the 
B&W images I have had sitting on a mantlepiece in our living room (no 
direct sunlight, prints unframed).  Similar prints on HP's top of the 
line glossy paper have had no fading at all that I can see.  As much 
as I hate to say it, the combination of ink and paper really does 
matter.  I would caution all of those expecting some sort of image 
stability from ink-jet prints to test carefully under display 
conditions (particularly with the inks being as expensive as they 
are).

Re: [Digital BW] Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-12 by Steve Bell

I suspect the Kirkland glossy paper isn't a swellable polymer type, so will
fade with dye based inks.

The 59 grey cartridge inks are dye, so need a swellable polymer paper for
the claimed archival properties of the HP printer. I have framed prints at
home, and 4 that have been part of a monochrome group exhibition that has
been moving from library to library over the last year, all with no fading.
They were printed on HP's recommended premium plus paper and Ilford Galerie
Classic Pearl.

As the MIS inks and Epson UC are pigment based, not dye, I wouldn't expect
the fast fading quoted. How long it will last though, I've no idea.

Steve Bell
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 12/8/05 10:51 pm, "Scott McLoughlin" <scott@...> wrote:

> Below, this was a post from an HP user on the LUG. Wondering about
> whether this will apply to Kirkland Paper + MIS inks or the UC
> inks?
> 
> Scott
> ------
> 
> I've been printing B&W prints with Kirkland glossy paper from Costco for about
> six months now using a HP 7690 and their grey/black carts.  There has been a
> noticable fade towards yellow/green in the B&W images I have had sitting on a
> mantlepiece in our living room (no direct sunlight, prints unframed).  Similar
> prints on HP's top of the line glossy paper have had no fading at all that I
> can see.  As much as I hate to say it, the combination of ink and paper really
> does matter.  I would caution all of those expecting some sort of image
> stability from ink-jet prints to test carefully under display conditions
> (particularly with the inks being as expensive as they are).

RE: [Digital BW] Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-12 by Paul Roark

Yes, Kirkland is not appropriate for dyes.  On the other hand, it appears to
be among the very few glossy papers with acid-free paper inside, like the
Epson premium papers.  It does not appear to be a "cheap" paper in terms of
it's manufacturing.  I'll know more soon, as I have some Kirkland paper in
the fader now. 

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve
> Bell
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 2:24 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?
> 
> I suspect the Kirkland glossy paper isn't a swellable polymer type, so
> will
> fade with dye based inks.
> 
> The 59 grey cartridge inks are dye, so need a swellable polymer paper for
> the claimed archival properties of the HP printer. I have framed prints at
> home, and 4 that have been part of a monochrome group exhibition that has
> been moving from library to library over the last year, all with no
> fading.
> They were printed on HP's recommended premium plus paper and Ilford
> Galerie
> Classic Pearl.
> 
> As the MIS inks and Epson UC are pigment based, not dye, I wouldn't expect
> the fast fading quoted. How long it will last though, I've no idea.
> 
> Steve Bell
> 
> 
> On 12/8/05 10:51 pm, "Scott McLoughlin" <scott@...> wrote:
> 
> > Below, this was a post from an HP user on the LUG. Wondering about
> > whether this will apply to Kirkland Paper + MIS inks or the UC
> > inks?
> >
> > Scott
> > ------
> >
> > I've been printing B&W prints with Kirkland glossy paper from Costco for
> about
> > six months now using a HP 7690 and their grey/black carts.  There has
> been a
> > noticable fade towards yellow/green in the B&W images I have had sitting
> on a
> > mantlepiece in our living room (no direct sunlight, prints unframed).
> Similar
> > prints on HP's top of the line glossy paper have had no fading at all
> that I
> > can see.  As much as I hate to say it, the combination of ink and paper
> really
> > does matter.  I would caution all of those expecting some sort of image
> > stability from ink-jet prints to test carefully under display conditions
> > (particularly with the inks being as expensive as they are).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND
> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-12 by Scott McLoughlin

So, to sum up, we might look forward to better results with pigment
inks, yes?

Look forward to you results.

Scott

Paul Roark wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Yes, Kirkland is not appropriate for dyes. On the other hand, it 
> appears to
> be among the very few glossy papers with acid-free paper inside, like the
> Epson premium papers. It does not appear to be a "cheap" paper in terms of
> it's manufacturing. I'll know more soon, as I have some Kirkland paper in
> the fader now.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve
> > Bell
> > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 2:24 PM
> > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?
> >
> > I suspect the Kirkland glossy paper isn't a swellable polymer type, so
> > will
> > fade with dye based inks.
> >
> > The 59 grey cartridge inks are dye, so need a swellable polymer 
> paper for
> > the claimed archival properties of the HP printer. I have framed 
> prints at
> > home, and 4 that have been part of a monochrome group exhibition 
> that has
> > been moving from library to library over the last year, all with no
> > fading.
> > They were printed on HP's recommended premium plus paper and Ilford
> > Galerie
> > Classic Pearl.
> >
> > As the MIS inks and Epson UC are pigment based, not dye, I wouldn't 
> expect
> > the fast fading quoted. How long it will last though, I've no idea.
> >
> > Steve Bell
> >
> >
> > On 12/8/05 10:51 pm, "Scott McLoughlin" <scott@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Below, this was a post from an HP user on the LUG. Wondering about
> > > whether this will apply to Kirkland Paper + MIS inks or the UC
> > > inks?
> > >
> > > Scott
> > > ------
> > >
> > > I've been printing B&W prints with Kirkland glossy paper from 
> Costco for
> > about
> > > six months now using a HP 7690 and their grey/black carts. There has
> > been a
> > > noticable fade towards yellow/green in the B&W images I have had 
> sitting
> > on a
> > > mantlepiece in our living room (no direct sunlight, prints unframed).
> > Similar
> > > prints on HP's top of the line glossy paper have had no fading at all
> > that I
> > > can see. As much as I hate to say it, the combination of ink and paper
> > really
> > > does matter. I would caution all of those expecting some sort of image
> > > stability from ink-jet prints to test carefully under display 
> conditions
> > > (particularly with the inks being as expensive as they are).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
> resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same
> > page.
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
> to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> > membership without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed 
> from
> > the membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> > and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files
> > section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> >
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND
> > MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> > OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; 
> (iii)
> > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> > PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from 
> the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital 
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
> Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the 
> Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd 
> AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
> LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, 
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE 
> LOSSES (EVEN IF THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
> YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), 
> RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, 
> THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF 
> YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD 
> PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER 
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>     * Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint>" on
>       the web.
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Re: Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-13 by scott_now_coming

HP Premium Plus Photo Paper should be the only paper to use with an 
HP photo printer if you expect longevity.

I would never use Kirkland (or any other paper) in an HP printer.

Scott


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Hahn" 
<markhahn2000@y...> wrote:
> I wouldn't trust that paper for anything.  At a county fair 
recently 
> my young daughter begged me to waste $10 getting a photo of her 
done 
> with a giant python.  I looked over and saw a couple 7690s and a 
box 
> of HP Premium Plus Glossy and figured... well, at least it will 
> last.  I paid my money AND THEN saw the Kirkland box.  Put the 
photo 
> on the mantle for two weeks and it faded to orange (accerated due 
to 
> running the swamp cooler)... that's dye etc... but still.  Aside 
from 
> not being waterproof, the HP Premium Plus is an excellent glossy 
> paper.
> 
> I don't understand being cheap with paper... if you are selling the 
> output, a buck or so shouldn't cut into your profits and if it is 
> done just for personal reasons, why bother produce junk... just my 
> opinion...
> 
> mark
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Scott 
McLoughlin 
> <scott@a...> wrote:
> > Below, this was a post from an HP user on the LUG. Wondering about
> > whether this will apply to Kirkland Paper + MIS inks or the UC
> > inks?
> > 
> > Scott
> > ------
> > 
> > I've been printing B&W prints with Kirkland glossy paper from 
> Costco for about six months now using a HP 7690 and their 
grey/black 
> carts.  There has been a noticable fade towards yellow/green in the 
> B&W images I have had sitting on a mantlepiece in our living room 
(no 
> direct sunlight, prints unframed).  Similar prints on HP's top of 
the 
> line glossy paper have had no fading at all that I can see.  As 
much 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> as I hate to say it, the combination of ink and paper really does 
> matter.  I would caution all of those expecting some sort of image 
> stability from ink-jet prints to test carefully under display 
> conditions (particularly with the inks being as expensive as they 
> are).

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-13 by Paul Roark

> 
> HP Premium Plus Photo Paper should be the only paper to use with an
> HP photo printer if you expect longevity.
> 

In March 2004 I fade tested the HP B&W ink on HP, Ilford Classic Pearl, and
Kodak's latest paper at the time.  They were all close, with the HP paper
having a very slight edge in the midtones, and Kodak having a slightly
better dmax after the fade test.  (The Ilford 100% patch actually increased
in density, but it was significantly lower to start with.)  I generally
concluded the swellable papers on the market are close to the same and all
very good considering the inks are dyes.  (They are still not in the same
league with carbon, however.)

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

[Digital BW] Re: Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-14 by scott_now_coming

Which Kodak paper did you use: Premium or Professional?

I got a sample of the Kodak Professional Luster from Kodak directly.

I printed some color photos on the paper and was really impressed, 
since I wasn't using custom profile, only the profile from Kodak.

Longevity is a big concern though. 

By the way, I was using Epson inks in the R800, fwiw.

Scott


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> > 
> > HP Premium Plus Photo Paper should be the only paper to use with 
an
> > HP photo printer if you expect longevity.
> > 
> 
> In March 2004 I fade tested the HP B&W ink on HP, Ilford Classic 
Pearl, and
> Kodak's latest paper at the time.  They were all close, with the HP 
paper
> having a very slight edge in the midtones, and Kodak having a 
slightly
> better dmax after the fade test.  (The Ilford 100% patch actually 
increased
> in density, but it was significantly lower to start with.)  I 
generally
> concluded the swellable papers on the market are close to the same 
and all
> very good considering the inks are dyes.  (They are still not in 
the same
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> league with carbon, however.)
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-14 by Paul Roark

Scott,

 
> Which Kodak paper did you use: Premium or Professional?

It was the latest Kodak paper as of 3/04 that was said by Kodak to be a
"breakthrough."  They were marketing is under the name "Ultima Picture
Paper," "ColorLast" version.  The inks were the HP 7660 B&W inks.  They were
printed by a third party.  My interest was that Kodak was claiming something
like 100 years even without framing.  It turns out, of course, that Kodak
simply re-defined how much light a print would get in "100 years" of
display.  Nonetheless, it appears to be a good "swellable polymer" type of
paper.

> 
> By the way, I was using Epson inks in the R800, fwiw.

The Kodak paper I used was specifically for dyes.  My attempts to print
pigments on these swellable emulsions has resulted in prints that take a
very long time to dry.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
> <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> > >
> > > HP Premium Plus Photo Paper should be the only paper to use with
> an
> > > HP photo printer if you expect longevity.
> > >
> >
> > In March 2004 I fade tested the HP B&W ink on HP, Ilford Classic
> Pearl, and
> > Kodak's latest paper at the time.  They were all close, with the HP
> paper
> > having a very slight edge in the midtones, and Kodak having a
> slightly
> > better dmax after the fade test.  (The Ilford 100% patch actually
> increased
> > in density, but it was significantly lower to start with.)  I
> generally
> > concluded the swellable papers on the market are close to the same
> and all
> > very good considering the inks are dyes.  (They are still not in
> the same
> > league with carbon, however.)
> >
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

[Digital BW] Re: Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-14 by scott_now_coming

Paul, 

Thanks for the reply.

Here is the Kodak Professional paper I used:

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/papers/inkjet/mai
n.jhtml;jsessionid=Q0OZPZZ4LSKVXFW4FBCXWEMW1YUEQ4L4?
id=0.1.18.16.5&lc=en&_requestid=11666


It's for pigment or dye inks and is instant dry.

Look on their website, you should be able to get a free sample.

This paper just hit the market recently. I see B&H carries it. I'm 
not sure who else does at this time.

Scott


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Scott,
> 
>  
> > Which Kodak paper did you use: Premium or Professional?
> 
> It was the latest Kodak paper as of 3/04 that was said by Kodak to 
be a
> "breakthrough."  They were marketing is under the name "Ultima 
Picture
> Paper," "ColorLast" version.  The inks were the HP 7660 B&W inks.  
They were
> printed by a third party.  My interest was that Kodak was claiming 
something
> like 100 years even without framing.  It turns out, of course, that 
Kodak
> simply re-defined how much light a print would get in "100 years" of
> display.  Nonetheless, it appears to be a good "swellable polymer" 
type of
> paper.
> 
> > 
> > By the way, I was using Epson inks in the R800, fwiw.
> 
> The Kodak paper I used was specifically for dyes.  My attempts to 
print
> pigments on these swellable emulsions has resulted in prints that 
take a
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> very long time to dry.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
>

[Digital BW] Re: Kirkland Paper Print Longevity?

2005-08-14 by scott_now_coming

Here's a better link for a quick look:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=333094&is=REG&addedTroughType=search

Scott


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Scott,
> 
>  
> > Which Kodak paper did you use: Premium or Professional?
> 
> It was the latest Kodak paper as of 3/04 that was said by Kodak to 
be a
> "breakthrough."  They were marketing is under the name "Ultima 
Picture
> Paper," "ColorLast" version.  The inks were the HP 7660 B&W inks.  
They were
> printed by a third party.  My interest was that Kodak was claiming 
something
> like 100 years even without framing.  It turns out, of course, that 
Kodak
> simply re-defined how much light a print would get in "100 years" of
> display.  Nonetheless, it appears to be a good "swellable polymer" 
type of
> paper.
> 
> > 
> > By the way, I was using Epson inks in the R800, fwiw.
> 
> The Kodak paper I used was specifically for dyes.  My attempts to 
print
> pigments on these swellable emulsions has resulted in prints that 
take a
> very long time to dry.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
> > <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > HP Premium Plus Photo Paper should be the only paper to use 
with
> > an
> > > > HP photo printer if you expect longevity.
> > > >
> > >
> > > In March 2004 I fade tested the HP B&W ink on HP, Ilford Classic
> > Pearl, and
> > > Kodak's latest paper at the time.  They were all close, with 
the HP
> > paper
> > > having a very slight edge in the midtones, and Kodak having a
> > slightly
> > > better dmax after the fade test.  (The Ilford 100% patch 
actually
> > increased
> > > in density, but it was significantly lower to start with.)  I
> > generally
> > > concluded the swellable papers on the market are close to the 
same
> > and all
> > > very good considering the inks are dyes.  (They are still not in
> > the same
> > > league with carbon, however.)
> > >
> > > Paul
> > > www.PaulRoark.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> > 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> > membership without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of 
digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
removed from
> > the membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules 
and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the 
group Owner
> > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the 
Files
> > section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > 
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, 
THE PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" 
AND
> > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
LIABLE TO
> > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL 
OR
> > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS 
OF
> > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF 
THE
> > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP 
HAVE BEEN
> > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) 
THE USE
> > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; 
(ii)
> > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR 
DATA; (iii)
> > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
PRINT
> > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, 
THE
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.