Interesting that the colour shift is extremely close - really only the luminance figures have anything close to a meaningful difference. Am I reading your numbers correctly? Where you have a positive change in L* is that a fall in L* or increase? I would also suggest that the differences in L* are trivial. For example, a change of 0.67 of a base of around 53.55 is a mere 0.012 in density. It is, however, very comforting to know that the UT7 and Epson K3 inks are in the same league. This should give UT7 purchases a lot of assurance with respect to the relative endurance of their ink. > From: Paul Roark <paul.roark@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:05:43 -0700 > To: DigitalB&WPrint <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Fade test -- 4800 v. UT7, MIS old v. new, & Kirkland > > My latest fade test (compact fluorescent light) reached 600 hours. So, I > have some initial fade results. > > The short version: UT7 showed less fading than the 4800 "Advanced B&W" mode > prints both in the highlights and at 50%; the MIS new base does not appear > to negatively affect UT performance; and inks on Kirkland paper are very > stable. > > > Notes: The results are expressed in Lab and were read with the X-Rite DTP 22 > spectrophotometer. The same paper batches were used for all comparisons. > The results shown are the average of 3 readings. The affects of the > variability of the spectrophotometer were minimized by reading comparison > test strips at the same time. The actual starting, pre-fade densities may > vary from the control test strips, but comparisons based on the pre-fade > measurements resulted in similar comparisons. The UT7 comparison test > strips were printed with "neutral" curves that were modified to match the > density and tone of the 4800 test strips as closely as reasonably possible. > > > Spectrophotometer readings: > > EEM 0% (paper white) Control: (96.83, 1.03, -3.49) > > Change: (-0.04, -1.4, 4.48) > > Comment: As we know, the paper yellows. > This will affect mostly the highlight results. > > 4800 EEM AB&W Neutral 5% Control: (92.76, 1.20, -3.79) > > Change: (0.16, -1.49, 4.92) > > 7600 UT7 Neutral 5% Control: (92.79, 0.83, -3.98) > > Change: (-0.02, -1.59, 4.94) > > > > 4800 EEM AB&W Neutral 10% Control: (88.35, 1.07, -3.11) > > Change: (0.52, -1.39, 4.73) > > 7600 UT7 Neutral 10% Control: (89.18, 0.34, -3.34) > > Change: (-0.04, -1.41, 4.53) > > > 4800 EEM AB&W Neutral 50% Control: (53.55, 0.72, 0.38) > > Change: (0.67, -0.55, 2.04) > > 7600 UT7 Neutral 50% Control: (54.04, 1.96, -0.27) > > Change: (0.08, -0.68, 1.93) > > 2200 UT7 New Base 50% Control: (53.53, 1.17, 0.14) > > Change: (-0.14, -0.68, 2.04) > > Kirkland UT7 50% Control: (56.54, -0.52, -4.17) > > Change: (-0.33, -0.56, 1.24) > > > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Fade test -- 4800 v. UT7, MIS old v. new, & Kirkland
2005-08-17 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.