Interesting how these things work. I think I found in lens testing that the best way to get a good focus with an AF system was to have it come at the correct value from both directions and then average the 2 -- that seemed to cancel out the system's tendency to overshoot or whatever. With the DPT22 I ended up doing close to what you did -- alternate between test strips. Paul www.PaulRoark.com > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > dfaprinting > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:23 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Fade test -- 4800 v. UT7, MIS old v. new, & > Kirkland > > In my use of the DTP22, I found that it was very consistant over > time. By that I mean that measurements would be very similar in > different sessions, as long as you calibrate before each session. And > actually, I think the DTP22 had better consistancy when reading a > single patch multiple times than my i1. If I rest the i1 over a > patch, and read that patch time after time, the value changes each > time, and the values also increase each time. I can change a 1.7 > patch into a 1.5 by simply reading a dozen or more times in a row, > it's very strange. Now if I alternate between that black patch and > paper white, that increase does not happen. The DTP22 was just a > random value that hovered around the "correct" value when you read > the same patch multiple times without measuring something different, > which is more along the line of what you would expect. And the > shocker was that my 1995 DTP22 measurements were very close to the i1 > when I first got the i1, the old thing held up very well over time. I > almost even sent it back to Xrite to be tweaked, but now that seems > like money poorly spent when another $400 will get you a brand new i1 > that reads much faster than the DTP22 ever could. I should probably > sell the DTP22 and the DTP32 (old model) that I have. > > The other shocker is how accurate the Color Savvy Colormouse was. For > density reading that would make a decent tool to use. > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Fade test -- 4800 v. UT7, MIS old v. new, & Kirkland
2005-08-17 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.