Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Fade test -- 4800 v. UT7, MIS old v. new, & Kirkland

2005-08-17 by Paul Roark

Interesting how these things work.  I think I found in lens testing that the
best way to get a good focus with an AF system was to have it come at the
correct value from both directions and then average the 2 -- that seemed to
cancel out the system's tendency to overshoot or whatever.  With the DPT22 I
ended up doing close to what you did -- alternate between test strips.  

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> dfaprinting
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:23 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Fade test -- 4800 v. UT7, MIS old v. new, &
> Kirkland
> 
> In my use of the DTP22, I found that it was very consistant over
> time. By that I mean that measurements would be very similar in
> different sessions, as long as you calibrate before each session. And
> actually, I think the DTP22 had better consistancy when reading a
> single patch multiple times than my i1. If I rest the i1 over a
> patch, and read that patch time after time, the value changes each
> time, and the values also increase each time. I can change a 1.7
> patch into a 1.5 by simply reading a dozen or more times in a row,
> it's very strange. Now if I alternate between that black patch and
> paper white, that increase does not happen. The DTP22 was just a
> random value that hovered around the "correct" value when you read
> the same patch multiple times without measuring something different,
> which is more along the line of what you would expect. And the
> shocker was that my 1995 DTP22 measurements were very close to the i1
> when I first got the i1, the old thing held up very well over time. I
> almost even sent it back to Xrite to be tweaked, but now that seems
> like money poorly spent when another $400 will get you a brand new i1
> that reads much faster than the DTP22 ever could. I should probably
> sell the DTP22 and the DTP32 (old model) that I have.
> 
> The other shocker is how accurate the Color Savvy Colormouse was. For
> density reading that would make a decent tool to use.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.