With digital files there is less info in shadows than highlights. A quick disclaimer before adding the following information. I was trying to remember where I heard this originally but was not able to. Therefore, I add the following with the warning that if you want more detail on this you'll have to search for it. From what I understand, digital image files hold far less information in the shadows than the higher values. This is due to the nature of the digital sensor's response (scanner or camera). Unlike the human eye or photographic film, the sensors record data according to a linear model. So in the case of a 12 bit image, there would be 4096 different levels of luminosity. But this doesn't translate to 4096 equivalent steps. Instead, if we use an 11 zone model the amount of data recorded would be as recorded below, the data being halved for each zone. It's sort of like photographing 2048 light bulbs, and turning off half of them for each photo. With film this would result in single zone steps, from the highest zone to the least. So, for a 12 bit image the amount of data per zone is as follows zone levels 1 2048 2 1024 3 512 4 256 5 128 6 64 7 32 8 16 9 8 10 4 11 2 and for an 8 bit image zone levels 1 128 2 64 3 32 4 16 5 8 6 4 7 2 8 1 ... Obviously, with the 8 bit image, if you try to open up your shadows at all, they'll posterize. Whereas the 16 bit image will have a greater latitude for manipulation. Well that is about the extent of my knowledge regarding this topic. An additional note however, is that this is the reason that you want to expose for your highlights and "develop" for the shadows with digital, the exact opposite of how one approaches exposure with film. Hope that helps. Eric www.ericashworth.net
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 8 bit vs 16 bit conversions
2005-08-18 by Eric Ashworth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.