Still rgb only as far as I know. PK folks said they were working on a 16 bit B&W version, but guess it is still on the back burner. I use the deadman sharpening actions for B&W. On Aug 21, 2005, at 7:37 PM, Brian Ellis wrote: >> The one thing that I love about Photokit Sharpener Pro is its ability >> to selectively sharpen edges in only that part of the image that >> requires the enhancement. >> > > There's a sharpening method described in the tutorial section of > Luminous > Landscape that does the same thing and is free. It may not be as > good in > other respects as Photokit but it does do that. It also doesn't > require > converting to rgb, which Photokit did when I tried it a year or so > ago. Does > it still require that conversion? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ernst Dinkla" <E.Dinkla@...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 3:12 PM > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Genuine Fractals (and Photokit Sharpener > workflow) > > > btvarner wrote: > > >> >> >> The one thing that I love about Photokit Sharpener Pro is its ability >> to selectively sharpen edges in only that part of the image that >> requires the enhancement. I guess I will try an experiment to only >> sharpening in Photoshop/Photokit Sharpener the parts of an image that >> require the very most attention and do absolutely no other sharpening >> on the image. Then open in Qimage to size and print. >> >> >> > > That would be the way to do selective sharpening. Qimage can't as > far as > I know and being essentialy a printer program it isn't intended for > that > work either. If you sharpen the image selectively or entirely so it > looks sharp on the screen then I wouldn't take the default (5) print > sharpening of Qimage but the 2 at most. > > Ernst [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Genuine Fractals (and Photokit Sharpener workflow)
2005-08-21 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.