In a message dated 8/23/2005 8:51:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes: Please explain further the last paragraph of your message. I don't understand what you are saying there. A 1Ds full frame 24 megapixel equal to the 20D? Thanks PV I'm just saying that if Canon were to take the amazing performance of the 20d's electronics, maintain the same well site pitch, and make a full frame chip with it, they would have a 24 Megapixel Super-Baaaaad Big Dog SLR that they could advertise as having more pixels than the more expensive Medium Format backs. Since the average resolution of premium Canon glass is 20-100% higher than medium format glass, they would compare favorably with the MF backs/MF cameras costing much more so a jump from 16 Megapixels to 24 is entirely feasible RIGHT NOW if they want to do it. But it's all words on my part not theirs. Claude [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons)
2005-08-24 by claudej1@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.