Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons)

2005-08-24 by Steve Kale

I should add though that one of the bigger issues facing digital cameras is
their exposure/metering systems.  Designed for film these systems have not
made the transition to exposing for the linear nature of a chip.  They still
meter for a "middle grey" - not necessarily 18% but still a middle grey of
some sort.  The manufacturers still have a leg in either camp.  Their
metering is film centric while the capture plane is digital.  The sooner the
two are properly aligned the better.  In my humble opinion, a change here
will do more for 35mm digital quality than a few more pixels.


> From: Steve Kale <stevekale@...>

> 
> I suspect that noise will still be a big issue.  The medium format backs
> will beat the Canon "Big Dog" if only because an SLR shooter requires a
> level of speed that the typical medium format digi-back shooter doesn't.  At
> some point I am sure speed implies greater noise (I am not talking about ISO
> speed).
> 
> I am, though, very surprised by your comment re Canon glass.  I only have
> two Canon lenses: the 28-70 f2.8L and the 70-200 f2.8L.  Admittedly the
> Canon glass I have is one generation old - the first replaced by the 24-70
> f2.8L and the second by an IS version - but neither of these comes close to
> my Contax Zeiss 80mm planar or 120 Makro-Planar.
> 
> I have used the Phase One backs (up to the P25) in a studio, handheld, with
> the Contax 645/80 Planar. They beat the 1ds2 for sharpness and detail any
> day.  
> 
> 
>> From: <claudej1@...>
> 
>> 
>> I'm just saying that if Canon were to take the amazing performance of the
>> 20d's electronics, maintain the same well site pitch, and make a full frame
>> chip 
>>  with it, they would have a 24 Megapixel Super-Baaaaad Big Dog SLR that they
>> could advertise as having more pixels than the more expensive Medium Format
>> backs.
>>  
>> Since the average resolution of premium Canon glass is 20-100% higher than
>> medium format glass, they would compare favorably with the MF backs/MF
>> cameras
>> costing much more so a jump from 16 Megapixels to 24 is entirely feasible
>> RIGHT NOW if they want to do it.
>>  
>> But it's all words on my part not theirs.
>>  
>> Claude
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership
> without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the
> membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
> Moderators. See „Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines‰ in the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE „OWNER‰ AND
> „MODERATORS‰ OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL,
> USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  „OWNER‰ AND „MODERATORS‰ OF
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW,
> THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR
> TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.