Steve, Rent or borrow a 135 f/2 and a 35mm f/1.4, both L glass of course. Better be sitting down when you open one of those 1DsII raw files.... Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Steve Kale Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:32 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons) I suspect that noise will still be a big issue. The medium format backs will beat the Canon "Big Dog" if only because an SLR shooter requires a level of speed that the typical medium format digi-back shooter doesn't. At some point I am sure speed implies greater noise (I am not talking about ISO speed). I am, though, very surprised by your comment re Canon glass. I only have two Canon lenses: the 28-70 f2.8L and the 70-200 f2.8L. Admittedly the Canon glass I have is one generation old - the first replaced by the 24-70 f2.8L and the second by an IS version - but neither of these comes close to my Contax Zeiss 80mm planar or 120 Makro-Planar. I have used the Phase One backs (up to the P25) in a studio, handheld, with the Contax 645/80 Planar. They beat the 1ds2 for sharpness and detail any day. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 1Ds Mk III prediction (was new canons)
2005-08-24 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.